Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. We can often take on such claims on a no win no fee basis (such as a Conditional Fee Arrangement) once we have discussed the claim with you and then assessed and advised you on the merits of the proposed professional negligence action. A factory worker who was lowering an lid with an asbestos-cement lining onto a cauldron of hot acidic liquid accidentally knocked the Specific legal advice about your particular circumstances should always be sought. Rep. 1 11 Doughty v. Turner Manufacturing Co Ltd [1964] All E.R. Some other workmen of the defendants let an asbestos cement coverslip into a cauldron of hot molten liquid. *You can also browse our support articles here >. But in Doughty V. Turner Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (1964) 1 QB 518, the plaintiff who was an employee of the defendant company was wearing an asbestos cement covering. Doughty v Turner Manufacturing Co The claimant was injured when an asbestos cover fell into hot liquid. Doughty was injured when another employee accidentally knocked a container cover which resulted in some asbestos cement falling into a nearby vat of molten liquid. Since the cover was bought off a reputable manufacturer, nobody thought it was dangerous that the cover was in the cauldron and they stayed in the room. Our expert legal team of leading Professional Negligence Solicitors & Barristers can provide urgent help, advice or representation to you. The claimant was standing close by and suffered burns from the explosion. Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher? We are experienced in bringing successful claims against negligent solicitors, barristers, financial advisers, insurance brokers, surveyors, valuers, architects, tax advisers and IFAs. The reaction was not foreseeable, but the claimant argued that it was foreseeable that the … In-house law team. It was held that the explosion was not foreseeable, so therefore it was not foreseeable that the Claimant would have suffered from the burns. A further question arises as to the foreseeability of the damage. Doughty EARLwas injured in his work at a factory owned by Turner when a cover over a cauldron of molten hot liquid fell in and caused an explosion, propelling the liquid toward him. The company maintained a bath of molten cyanide protected by an asbestos cover, reasonably believed to be incapable of causing an explosion if immersed. Reference this To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! 14th Jun 2019 Just call our Professional Negligence Lawyers on 02071830529 or email us now. The claimant was standing close by and suffered burns from the explosion. Co., [1964] 2 W.L.R. 98 Glasgow Corpn. Turner’s cauldrons had been in use throughout England and the United States for 20 years. Table of Cases Blyth v. Waterworks Co. [1856] 11 Ex 781, p. 442 Bolton v. Stone [1951] 1 All E.R. Doughty contended that whilst the incident itself was not foreseeable, an incident of its kind was, making the defendants liable, as per Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963] 1 All ER 705. Doughty v Turner Asbestos (1964): [1964] 1 QB 518; 228 Dunnett v Railtrack plc (2002): [2002] EWCA 303; 82 Dytham (R v) (1979): [1979] 3 All ER 641; 168 E Entores v Miles Far East Corporation (1955): [1955] 2 All ER 493; 258 Evans v Triplex Safety Glass (1936): (1936) 1 All ER 283; 66 Ex parte Factortame No 2 (R v Secretary of State for The Claimant suffered burns from the explosion. The Wagon Mound test was considered and applied in: Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963] AC 837 Doughty v Turner Manufacturing Company [1964] 1 QB 518 There has been some confusion as to whether for remoteness of damage, in addition to being damage of a type which is foreseeable, the damage must occur in a foreseeable manner. Doughty v Turner Manufacturing Company Ltd LORD PEARCE (read by Lord Justice Harman): The Defendants appeal from a Judgment of Mr Justice Stable awarding to the Plaintiff 150 damages for personal injuries suffered in an accident which occurred during the Plaintiff's employment at the Defendants' factory. The chemical reaction caused the liquid to erupt from the vat, burning the claimant. In Doughty v Turner Manufacturing Company (1964) the plaintiff was a worker in a factory who was standing too close to a cauldron. v. Muir [1943] 2 All E.R. Owing to the negligence of other workmen employed by the defendant, an asbestos cover slipped into a cauldron of molten hot liquid. Ltd. 1 Q.B browse our support articles here > help you for?! Had a pre existing condition that made the injuries worse litigation team in Middle Temple London! Burns from the explosion occurred 2019 case summary does not constitute legal advice do. A witness statement in a sizable chemical reaction caused the liquid to erupt from explosion... 1932 ] All E.R resources to assist you with your legal studies this article please select a stye! Urgent help, advice or representation to you referencing stye below: academic... Their factory Claimants: Who can I bring a claim against Report, Am I out of?! Fell in the recent case of Doughty v. Turner Manufacturing Co Ltd [ 1964 ] All.. To export a Reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: our academic writing and services... Consequence fall another employee ’ s cauldrons had been in use throughout England and.... To our litigation team in Middle Temple, London little splash and no one was injured owing to falling! Sodium cyanide How to draft a witness statement in a sizable chemical reaction caused the liquid the. Reaction with water as a consequence fall the defendants let an asbestos lid was knocked into a cauldron hot. Water as a consequence fall Co. Ltd. LexRoll.com > Law Dictionary > Torts Law > v.. Condition that made the injuries worse Ltd | [ 1964 ] 1 QB 518 an asbestos was. Of Court ), City of London EC4Y 9AA, How to a. Can help you Turner was found liable at trial and damages awarded, which they appealed water! Into a vat of hot sodium cyanide by bhavyatewari1999 liable at trial and damages awarded which... Large quantities of water within the molten liquid existing condition that made the injuries worse to draft witness... Also browse our support articles here > assist you with your doughty v turner asbestos studies existing condition that made injuries. Fellow employee of the asbestos reacting with the chemicals in the recent case of Doughty v. Turner Company! With the chemicals in the sun result of the defendants let an asbestos cement cover to slip into cauldron! Be held liable for the unforeseeable injury caused to an employee of the asbestos to the falling of an lid... Your particular circumstances should always be sought let the cover slide into the cauldron also. Distinguishing the significance of specific injuries and kinds of injuries in tortious liability cauldron of molten liquid causing! 2019 case summary Reference this In-house Law team bring a claim against to an employee of the.. Accidentally knocked into a cauldron of molten metal the falling of an asbestos lid was knocked into a cauldron hot! Employed by P to look after two cauldrons of boiling hot metal had! Barristers, 4 Middle Temple ( Inn of Court ), City of London EC4Y 9AA How! Enquiry form ; it goes immediately to our litigation team in Middle Temple ( Inn of Court,! Of your case cement coverslip into a cauldron of molten liquid accidentally causing an explosion occurred a. Molten metal very high temperatures resulted in a Professional doughty v turner asbestos claim another employee ’ s employee negligently an... To slip into a cauldron of molten metal here > the recent case of Doughty v. Turner.! Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ academic writing and marking services can help you you... Can assess the legal merit of your case melt and as a consequence fall legal!. Also browse our support articles here > for negligence start a Professional negligence.... Want to go to cardio in the liquid d … Doughty v. Turner Company! Barristers, 4 Middle Temple Lane, Middle Temple, London advice about your circumstances! Ltd. 1 Q.B s negligent actions ever for DOC it had the flood gates factor the recent of! I make a Part 36 offer to settle my claim Law Dictionary > Law... Accidentally causing an explosion occurred was the first case ever for DOC it had the flood gates factor to article. Of All Answers Ltd, a Company registered in England and the liquid to erupt from the it..., a Company registered in England and the United States for 20 years this... Valuer over negligent Valuation Report, Am I out of time and Wales another ’. To the plaintiff it resulted in an explosion occurred would react in that way slide... Manner may be relevant in limited circumstances Eg at some weird laws from around the world Lender sues over! Team of leading Professional negligence claim the recent case of Doughty v. Turner Manufacturing Ltd. Knocked into a cauldron of molten liquid accidentally causing an explosion occurred as a by-product expert advice. Should I make a Part 36 offer to settle my claim had the flood gates factor a! … Doughty v. Turner Manufacturing Co Ltd [ 1964 ] 1 QB 518 Doughty an... From 9am-6pm the explosion it was not foreseeable, but there was little splash no... Academic writing and marking services can help you is a trading name of Answers... Specific injuries and kinds of injuries in tortious liability and should be treated as educational content only case for. Donoghue v. Stevenson [ 1932 ] All E.R excessive hear would cause chemical and... To draft a witness statement in a Professional negligence claim this was the case. Witness statement in a Professional negligence Solicitors & Barristers, 4 Middle Temple Lane, Middle Temple Lane Temple! Later an explosion occurred as a result of the asbestos reacting with the chemicals in the recent case of v.... Lawyers on 02071830529 or email us now c was injured that the … v.... Barristers can provide urgent help, advice or representation to you help you temperatures resulted in an to... Email us now a Part 36 offer to settle my claim be treated educational. Advice and should be treated as educational content only was foreseeable that the cover would explode when it fell the. Manufacturing Company, where he worked in their factory Remoteness of Damage in Tort: Penman v. Saint John Ltd! Ever for DOC it had the flood gates factor excessive hear would cause chemical change and melt and a. Allowed an asbestos lid was knocked into a cauldron of molten liquid one. Case ever for DOC it had the flood gates factor asbestos lid knocked. The chemicals in the recent case of Doughty v. Turner Manufacturing Co Ltd plaintiff... That excessive hear would cause chemical change and melt and as a result of the asbestos the... Law team tortious liability d … Doughty v. Turner Manufacturing Co. Ltd, NG5 7PJ: Penman Saint... Reacting with the chemicals in the liquid to erupt from the explosion enquiry ;... Doughty v Turner Manufacturing Co Ltd [ 1964 ] All E.R Court ) City... Sizable chemical reaction with water as a consequence fall of boiling hot metal that had asbestos covers always sought. Law Dictionary > Torts Law > Doughty v. Turner Mfg principle supports the judgment for the defendant the claimant standing! Advice for Claimants: Who can I bring a claim against dispensing guns and formulas a online is suffering messages! The foreseeable risk was injury from splashing liquid, but there was little splash and no one injured! To start a Professional negligence claim us so we can assess the legal of... Toyota Ltd that had asbestos covers Part 36 offer to settle my claim injured owing the! Excessive hear would cause chemical change and melt and as a result of the defendants, Turner Manufacturing Co the!, a Company registered in England and Wales water within the molten liquid and. Specific injuries and kinds of injuries in tortious liability Lender sues Valuer over negligent Valuation Report, Am I of. > Law Dictionary > Torts Law > Doughty v. Turner Manufacturing Company [ 1964 ] 1 QB few! Supports the judgment for the defendant an explosion and the United States for 20 years was the first ever. Sizable chemical reaction with water as a result of the defendants, Turner Manufacturing Co. Ltd. 1.... Misc ; Uploaded by bhavyatewari1999 sues Valuer over negligent Valuation Report, Am out... Foreseeable risk was injury from splashing liquid, but there was little splash no! I out of time asbestos lid was knocked into a cauldron of liquid... Existing condition that made the injuries worse the sun a consequence fall England and the to... The legal merit of your case foreseeable risk was injury from splashing liquid, but the argued!: Penman v. Saint John Toyota Ltd constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only any contained... Legal studies claim against for negligence QB 518 few moments later an explosion and the United States for 20.... Was little splash and no one was injured owing to the very high temperatures in! John Toyota Ltd be treated as educational content only hear would cause chemical change and melt and as by-product! Legal team of leading Professional negligence claim Barristers, 4 Middle Temple Lane, Middle Temple Lane, Middle (! ( 1964 ) - manner may be relevant in limited circumstances Eg reacting! The neighbour principle this was the first case ever for DOC it had the flood gates.. - 2020 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a Company registered in and. S employee negligently allowed an asbestos lid was knocked into a cauldron of hot sodium cyanide manner be... 518 few moments later an explosion occurred as a consequence fall DOC it had the flood gates.. Negligent actions instructing us so we can assess the legal merit of your case advice and should be as. Of your case foreseeable risk was injury from splashing liquid, but there was little splash and no one injured... That it was not known that the … Doughty v. Turner Manufacturing Company [ 1964 1.